Using a deceptively simple antenna roughly the size and shape of a dinner table, radio astronomers have made an unprecedented discovery: telltale fingerprints from the earliest stars in the cosmos, pressed into the afterglow of the universe's birth.
That signal, imprinted more deeply into the Big Bang's afterglow than scientists expected, could reveal much about the universe's youth and hint at the nature of dark matter, that mysterious substance that far outweighs all the normal matter in existence.
The findings and the theoretical work describing dark matter's potential role, described in two papers in the journal Nature, excited theoretical and experimental physicists alike.
"To my mind ... it's Nobel Prize-worthy twice, if it's real," said Avi Loeb, a Harvard University theoretical astrophysicist who was not involved in the research. "Not only did they detect the signal, but it actually is bigger than one can accommodate in the standard cosmological model. And you need new physics in order to explain a signal as big as they detected."
The first stars in the universe, born on the order of 100 million years after the Big Bang, some 13.8 billion years ago, were not like the stars of today. Because they coalesced out of the soup of neutral hydrogen (and a little helium) that filled the early cosmos, these stars grew large, burned bright and blue and then died quickly, probably surviving around 100 million years, give or take. (Our own sun, by comparison, is already 4.6 billion years old and has billions more years to go.)
When these short-lived stars went supernova, their explosive deaths forged heavier elements that seeded generations of stars to come. So understanding that stellar vanguard that brought light to the universe is key to understanding all the stars in galaxies today.
"We knew they should be different, and they really lay the seeds for everything that comes after them," lead author Judd Bowman, an experimental astrophysicist at Arizona State University, said of these primordial stars.
But it's exceedingly difficult to glimpse actual evidence of those first stars, and thus to get a firm grip on the timeline of events in this epoch of cosmic history. That's partly because there aren't a lot of stars to see in this early era. But it's also because the universe is expanding, and that expansion is stretching that ancient starlight into longer, "redder" wavelengths. That means that even NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, which has been able to see galaxies from 400 million years or so after the Big Bang, can't spot them.
In a project dubbed EDGES (short for Experiment to Detect Global EoR Signature), Bowman and his colleagues decided to take a different approach. In recent years, astronomers have studied the radiation afterglow of the Big Bang, known as the cosmic microwave background, or CMB. This radiation is subtle but extends over the entire sky, and astronomers have studied its tiny fluctuations in order to understand the underlying structure of the early universe.
The scientists realized that the cosmic microwave background, mixed with that soup of neutral hydrogen, might actually hold a subtle fingerprint from those primordial stars. That's because ultraviolet starlight would have shifted the hydrogen atoms' energy state, allowing them to absorb a particular wavelength out of the cosmic microwave background. Somewhere in the wavelengths that make up the CMB, they'd find this telltale slice of missing light.
Finding this fingerprint in the universe's afterglow was easier said than done. The local universe hurls an overwhelming amount of radio waves at Earth, drowning out this muted signal. On top of that, the scientists were using a fairly simple instrument -- a single radio detector roughly 6.4 feet long, about the size and shape of a dining table. With this single antenna, looking for a signal in one particular part of the sky would have been impossible.
Instead, they looked at the average radio spectrum across the entire sky and searched for discrepancies. They also placed their detector in a remote region of Australia, in the hopes of being as far away from human-generated radio waves as possible.
Sure enough, the scientists discovered a drop in the radio waves at 78 megahertz -- a wavelength of light that had been dramatically stretched, thanks to the universe's expansion, from the original frequency of 1,420 megahertz. (The higher a wave's frequency, the shorter its wavelength.) This wavelength must be missing, scientists say, because it was absorbed by the hydrogen gas that was primed by the light from those early stars.
"I think it's a little bit like winning the lottery, in a sense," said study co-author Alan Rogers, a radio astronomer at MIT. At the same time, he admitted, luck often favors the prepared. "We spent a lot of time improving the calibration of the instrument."
The results show that these first stars were already shining just 180 million years after the Big Bang. As those early stars died, they likely left behind black holes, neutron stars and supernovas, producing X-rays that further heated the hydrogen gas. Thanks to all this heating, the telltale absorption signal disappears around 90 million years later.
"This is a huge potential result that's really a breakthrough in the more-than-a-decade-long effort to detect signals from the very early universe," said Gregg Hallinan, a Caltech radio astronomer who was not involved in the work. "This measurement is our first step to begin to understand that era where the first stars and galaxies actually formed."
While the signal's location matched theoretical predictions, its shape did not. The dip in the light curve was flat-bottomed, like a U, and also twice as deep as scientists had predicted. That depth appears to imply that the hydrogen was much cooler than it should have been, at that point in time.
In a separate paper, theorist Rennan Barkana of Tel Aviv University presents a possible explanation: The hydrogen may have interacted with dark matter. If it turns out to be true, this would be groundbreaking, because until now dark matter has only been known to interact with normal matter through its gravitational influence. (That gravitational influence is pretty clear at large scales because there is more than five times as much dark matter as normal matter in the universe, even though it can't be seen or touched.)
But the first step, scientists said, would be for independent experiments to confirm that this signal really is out there.
© 2018 Los Angeles Times under contract with NewsEdge/Acquire Media. All rights reserved.
Image credit: iStock/Artist's Concept.
Posted: 2018-03-02 @ 10:49pm PT
"Light is the fastest thing in the universe". So they say.
Do this experiment: Point a lamp towards a screen placed 6 feet away. Flash the lamp for one second only, while you race to reach the screen as fast as possible, before the beam. Result: when you reached the screen, the beam of light had already reached before you did, it and was gone.
Do you understand? No? I will explain:
Again, it is said that light is the fastest thing traveling in space, right? That is a fact, I guess. The earliest stars produce light, which travels to the edge of the early universe, where there is nothing at the borders yet, no stars, no galaxies, nothing yet, because matter cannot travel faster than light!
However, the fact is: WE arrived FIRST, at this point of the universe, where we are right now, well before the light of the stars of the early universe reached this point. In other words, we won the race and reached the screen before the flash of the lamp did it, in our example above. No, this is NOT a joke.
Theoretically, it is IMPOSSIBLE that the matter that forms our solar system today, our galaxy, our bodies, could have traveled faster than the light emitted by the first stars of the early universe. Being the oldest bodies, they should have given light to the far edges and die before other newer cosmic bodies are born.
Therefore, the Big Bang is a myth, like all the fantasy jokes made up by atheists.